chore: Add 'release' to PR conventional commit types#266
chore: Add 'release' to PR conventional commit types#266SoulPancake wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 12 minutes and 40 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the PR title conventional-commit validation workflow to accept release as an allowed PR title type.
Changes:
- Added
releaseto thetask_typesallowlist forytanikin/pr-conventional-commits.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #266 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 69.84% 69.84%
=======================================
Files 140 140
Lines 10743 10743
=======================================
Hits 7503 7503
Misses 3240 3240 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Description
What problem is being solved?
How is it being solved?
What changes are made to solve it?
References
Review Checklist
main